<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If George W. Bush Had A Uterus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/if-george-w-bush-had-a-uterus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/if-george-w-bush-had-a-uterus/</link>
	<description>Where cat will mew and Dog will have her day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dogwoman</title>
		<link>http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/if-george-w-bush-had-a-uterus/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>dogwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaj</title>
		<link>http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/if-george-w-bush-had-a-uterus/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>gaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogwoman.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>Amen.

I love (in a laugh because otherwise you&#039;d cry sort of way) that our current administration doesn&#039;t want us having access to birth control, abortion even in the most dire circumstances, and allow insurance companies to charge women more (because of that whole pregnancy thing), but then they aren&#039;t willing to offer comprehensive health care to poor women, don&#039;t seem to think much of making daycare available for working women, are all about cutting welfare, and don&#039;t seem to be spending much money on promoting adoption (nevermind their feelings on--gasp--gays or other unmarrieds adopting children who desperately need a home).

If this is &#039;compassionate&#039; conservatism, I shudder to think what regular conservatism would look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
<p>I love (in a laugh because otherwise you&#8217;d cry sort of way) that our current administration doesn&#8217;t want us having access to birth control, abortion even in the most dire circumstances, and allow insurance companies to charge women more (because of that whole pregnancy thing), but then they aren&#8217;t willing to offer comprehensive health care to poor women, don&#8217;t seem to think much of making daycare available for working women, are all about cutting welfare, and don&#8217;t seem to be spending much money on promoting adoption (nevermind their feelings on&#8211;gasp&#8211;gays or other unmarrieds adopting children who desperately need a home).</p>
<p>If this is &#8216;compassionate&#8217; conservatism, I shudder to think what regular conservatism would look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
